A device designed to find out the longest frequent subsequence (LCS) of two or extra sequences (strings, arrays, and so on.) automates a course of essential in various fields. As an illustration, evaluating two variations of a textual content doc to determine shared content material might be effectively achieved by means of such a device. The consequence highlights the unchanged parts, offering insights into revisions and edits.
Automating this course of affords vital benefits by way of effectivity and accuracy, particularly with longer and extra advanced sequences. Manually evaluating prolonged strings is time-consuming and susceptible to errors. The algorithmic strategy underlying these instruments ensures exact identification of the longest frequent subsequence, forming a foundational factor in functions like bioinformatics (gene sequencing evaluation), model management techniques, and knowledge retrieval. Its growth stemmed from the necessity to effectively analyze and examine sequential knowledge, a problem that turned more and more prevalent with the expansion of computing and data-intensive analysis.
This understanding of the underlying performance and significance of automated longest frequent subsequence dedication lays the groundwork for exploring its sensible functions and algorithmic implementations, matters additional elaborated inside this text.
1. Automated Comparability
Automated comparability kinds the core performance of instruments designed for longest frequent subsequence (LCS) dedication. Eliminating the necessity for handbook evaluation, these instruments present environment friendly and correct outcomes, particularly essential for giant datasets and sophisticated sequences. This part explores the important thing aspects of automated comparability throughout the context of LCS calculation.
-
Algorithm Implementation
Automated comparability depends on particular algorithms, typically dynamic programming, to effectively decide the LCS. These algorithms systematically traverse the enter sequences, storing intermediate outcomes to keep away from redundant computations. This algorithmic strategy ensures the correct and well timed identification of the LCS, even for prolonged and sophisticated inputs. For instance, evaluating two gene sequences, every 1000’s of base pairs lengthy, could be computationally infeasible with out automated, algorithmic comparability.
-
Effectivity and Scalability
Guide comparability turns into impractical and error-prone as sequence size and complexity improve. Automated comparability addresses these limitations by offering a scalable resolution able to dealing with substantial datasets. This effectivity is paramount in functions like bioinformatics, the place analyzing giant genomic sequences is routine. The flexibility to course of huge quantities of information rapidly distinguishes automated comparability as a strong device.
-
Accuracy and Reliability
Human error poses a major danger in handbook comparability, significantly with prolonged or related sequences. Automated instruments remove this subjectivity, making certain constant and dependable outcomes. This accuracy is crucial for functions demanding precision, similar to model management techniques, the place even minor discrepancies between doc variations should be recognized.
-
Sensible Functions
The utility of automated comparability extends throughout varied domains. From evaluating totally different variations of a software program codebase to figuring out plagiarism in textual content paperwork, the functions are various. In bioinformatics, figuring out frequent subsequences in DNA or protein sequences aids in evolutionary research and illness analysis. This broad applicability underscores the significance of automated comparability in trendy knowledge evaluation.
These aspects collectively spotlight the numerous function of automated comparability in LCS dedication. By offering a scalable, correct, and environment friendly strategy, these instruments empower researchers and builders throughout various fields to research advanced sequential knowledge and extract significant insights. The shift from handbook to automated comparability has been instrumental in advancing fields like bioinformatics and knowledge retrieval, enabling the evaluation of more and more advanced and voluminous datasets.
2. String Evaluation
String evaluation performs an important function within the performance of an LCS (longest frequent subsequence) calculator. LCS algorithms function on strings, requiring strategies to decompose and examine them successfully. String evaluation gives these obligatory methods, enabling the identification and extraction of frequent subsequences. Take into account, for instance, evaluating two variations of a supply code file. String evaluation permits the LCS calculator to interrupt down every file into manageable items (traces, characters, or tokens) for environment friendly comparability. This course of facilitates figuring out unchanged code blocks, which symbolize the longest frequent subsequence, thereby highlighting modifications between variations.
The connection between string evaluation and LCS calculation extends past easy comparability. Superior string evaluation methods, similar to tokenization and parsing, improve the LCS calculator’s capabilities. Tokenization breaks down strings into significant items (e.g., phrases, symbols), enabling extra context-aware comparability. Take into account evaluating two sentences with slight variations in phrase order. Tokenization allows the LCS calculator to determine the frequent phrases no matter their order, offering a extra insightful evaluation. Parsing, alternatively, permits the extraction of structural info from strings, benefiting the comparability of code or structured knowledge. This deeper degree of study facilitates extra exact and significant LCS calculations.
Understanding the integral function of string evaluation inside LCS calculation gives insights into the general course of and its sensible implications. Efficient string evaluation methods improve the accuracy, effectivity, and applicability of LCS calculators. Challenges in string evaluation, similar to dealing with giant datasets or advanced string buildings, immediately impression the efficiency and utility of LCS instruments. Addressing these challenges by means of ongoing analysis and growth contributes to the development of LCS calculation strategies and their broader utility in various fields like bioinformatics, model management, and knowledge mining.
3. Subsequence Identification
Subsequence identification kinds the core logic of an LCS (longest frequent subsequence) calculator. An LCS calculator goals to seek out the longest subsequence frequent to 2 or extra sequences. Subsequence identification, due to this fact, constitutes the method of inspecting these sequences to pinpoint and extract all attainable subsequences, finally figuring out the longest one shared amongst them. This course of is essential as a result of it gives the basic constructing blocks upon which the LCS calculation is constructed. Take into account, for instance, evaluating two DNA sequences, “AATCCG” and “GTACCG.” Subsequence identification would contain inspecting all attainable ordered units of characters inside every sequence (e.g., “A,” “AT,” “TTC,” “CCG,” and so on.) after which evaluating these units between the 2 sequences to seek out shared subsequences.
The connection between subsequence identification and LCS calculation goes past easy extraction. The effectivity of the subsequence identification algorithms immediately impacts the general efficiency of the LCS calculator. Naive approaches that look at all attainable subsequences change into computationally costly for longer sequences. Subtle LCS algorithms, usually primarily based on dynamic programming, optimize subsequence identification by storing and reusing intermediate outcomes. This strategy avoids redundant computations and considerably enhances the effectivity of LCS calculation, significantly for advanced datasets like genomic sequences or giant textual content paperwork. The selection of subsequence identification method, due to this fact, dictates the scalability and practicality of the LCS calculator.
Correct and environment friendly subsequence identification is paramount for the sensible utility of LCS calculators. In bioinformatics, figuring out the longest frequent subsequence between DNA sequences helps decide evolutionary relationships and genetic similarities. In model management techniques, evaluating totally different variations of a file depends on LCS calculations to determine modifications and merge modifications effectively. Understanding the importance of subsequence identification gives a deeper appreciation of the capabilities and limitations of LCS calculators. Challenges in subsequence identification, similar to dealing with gaps or variations in sequences, proceed to drive analysis and growth on this space, resulting in extra strong and versatile LCS algorithms.
4. Size dedication
Size dedication is integral to the performance of an LCS (longest frequent subsequence) calculator. Whereas subsequence identification isolates frequent parts inside sequences, size dedication quantifies essentially the most in depth shared subsequence. This quantification is the defining output of an LCS calculator. The calculated size represents the extent of similarity between the enter sequences. For instance, when evaluating two variations of a doc, an extended LCS suggests higher similarity, indicating fewer revisions. Conversely, a shorter LCS implies extra substantial modifications. This size gives a concrete metric for assessing the diploma of shared info, essential for varied functions.
The significance of size dedication extends past mere quantification. It performs a essential function in various fields. In bioinformatics, the size of the LCS between gene sequences gives insights into evolutionary relationships. An extended LCS suggests nearer evolutionary proximity, whereas a shorter LCS implies higher divergence. In model management techniques, the size of the LCS aids in effectively merging code modifications and resolving conflicts. The size informs the system concerning the extent of shared code, facilitating automated merging processes. These examples illustrate the sensible significance of size dedication inside LCS calculations, changing uncooked subsequence info into actionable insights.
Correct and environment friendly size dedication is essential for the effectiveness of LCS calculators. The computational complexity of size dedication algorithms immediately impacts the efficiency of the calculator, particularly with giant datasets. Optimized algorithms, typically primarily based on dynamic programming, be certain that size dedication stays computationally possible even for prolonged sequences. Understanding the importance of size dedication, together with its related algorithmic challenges, gives a deeper appreciation for the complexities and sensible utility of LCS calculators throughout various fields.
5. Algorithm Implementation
Algorithm implementation is prime to the performance and effectiveness of an LCS (longest frequent subsequence) calculator. The chosen algorithm dictates the calculator’s efficiency, scalability, and talent to deal with varied sequence sorts and complexities. Understanding the nuances of algorithm implementation is essential for leveraging the complete potential of LCS calculators and appreciating their limitations.
-
Dynamic Programming
Dynamic programming is a broadly adopted algorithmic strategy for LCS calculation. It makes use of a table-based strategy to retailer and reuse intermediate outcomes, avoiding redundant computations. This optimization dramatically improves effectivity, significantly for longer sequences. Take into account evaluating two prolonged DNA strands. A naive recursive strategy would possibly change into computationally intractable, whereas dynamic programming maintains effectivity by storing and reusing beforehand computed LCS lengths for subsequences. This strategy allows sensible evaluation of enormous organic datasets.
-
House Optimization Strategies
Whereas dynamic programming affords vital efficiency enhancements, its reminiscence necessities might be substantial, particularly for very lengthy sequences. House optimization methods handle this limitation. As a substitute of storing all the dynamic programming desk, optimized algorithms typically retailer solely the present and former rows, considerably decreasing reminiscence consumption. This optimization permits LCS calculators to deal with huge datasets with out exceeding reminiscence limitations, essential for functions in genomics and huge textual content evaluation.
-
Different Algorithms
Whereas dynamic programming is prevalent, various algorithms exist for particular situations. As an illustration, if the enter sequences are identified to have particular traits (e.g., brief lengths, restricted alphabet dimension), specialised algorithms could supply additional efficiency features. Hirschberg’s algorithm, for instance, reduces the house complexity of LCS calculation, making it appropriate for conditions with restricted reminiscence sources. Selecting the suitable algorithm is determined by the precise utility necessities and the character of the enter knowledge.
-
Implementation Concerns
Sensible implementation of LCS algorithms requires cautious consideration of things past algorithmic selection. Programming language, knowledge buildings, and code optimization methods all affect the calculator’s efficiency. Effectively dealing with enter/output operations, reminiscence administration, and error dealing with are important for strong and dependable LCS calculation. Additional concerns embrace adapting the algorithm to deal with particular knowledge sorts, like Unicode characters or customized sequence representations.
The chosen algorithm and its implementation considerably affect the efficiency and capabilities of an LCS calculator. Understanding these nuances is essential for choosing the suitable device for a given utility and decoding its outcomes precisely. The continued growth of extra environment friendly and specialised algorithms continues to develop the applicability of LCS calculators in various fields.
6. Dynamic Programming
Dynamic programming performs an important function in effectively computing the longest frequent subsequence (LCS) of two or extra sequences. It affords a structured strategy to fixing advanced issues by breaking them down into smaller, overlapping subproblems. Within the context of LCS calculation, dynamic programming gives a strong framework for optimizing efficiency and dealing with sequences of considerable size.
-
Optimum Substructure
The LCS drawback reveals optimum substructure, which means the answer to the general drawback might be constructed from the options to its subproblems. Take into account discovering the LCS of two strings, “ABCD” and “AEBD.” The LCS of their prefixes, “ABC” and “AEB,” contributes to the ultimate LCS. Dynamic programming leverages this property by storing options to subproblems in a desk, avoiding redundant recalculations. This dramatically improves effectivity in comparison with naive recursive approaches.
-
Overlapping Subproblems
In LCS calculation, overlapping subproblems happen steadily. For instance, when evaluating prefixes of two strings, like “AB” and “AE,” and “ABC” and “AEB,” the LCS of “A” and “A” is computed a number of occasions. Dynamic programming addresses this redundancy by storing and reusing options to those overlapping subproblems within the desk. This reuse of prior computations considerably reduces runtime complexity, making dynamic programming appropriate for longer sequences.
-
Tabulation (Backside-Up Strategy)
Dynamic programming usually employs a tabulation or bottom-up strategy for LCS calculation. A desk shops the LCS lengths of progressively longer prefixes of the enter sequences. The desk is stuffed systematically, ranging from the shortest prefixes and constructing as much as the complete sequences. This structured strategy ensures that each one obligatory subproblems are solved earlier than their options are wanted, guaranteeing the proper computation of the general LCS size. This organized strategy eliminates the overhead of recursive calls and stack administration.
-
Computational Complexity
Dynamic programming considerably improves the computational complexity of LCS calculation in comparison with naive recursive strategies. The time and house complexity of dynamic programming for LCS is often O(mn), the place ‘m’ and ‘n’ are the lengths of the enter sequences. This polynomial complexity makes dynamic programming sensible for analyzing sequences of considerable size. Whereas various algorithms exist, dynamic programming affords a balanced trade-off between effectivity and implementation simplicity.
Dynamic programming gives a chic and environment friendly resolution to the LCS drawback. Its exploitation of optimum substructure and overlapping subproblems by means of tabulation leads to a computationally tractable strategy for analyzing sequences of great size and complexity. This effectivity underscores the significance of dynamic programming in varied functions, together with bioinformatics, model management, and knowledge retrieval, the place LCS calculations play an important function in evaluating and analyzing sequential knowledge.
7. Functions in Bioinformatics
Bioinformatics leverages longest frequent subsequence (LCS) calculations as a basic device for analyzing organic sequences, significantly DNA and protein sequences. Figuring out the LCS between sequences gives essential insights into evolutionary relationships, practical similarities, and potential disease-related mutations. The size and composition of the LCS supply quantifiable measures of sequence similarity, enabling researchers to deduce evolutionary distances and determine conserved areas inside genes or proteins. As an illustration, evaluating the DNA sequences of two species can reveal the extent of shared genetic materials, offering proof for his or her evolutionary relatedness. An extended LCS suggests a more in-depth evolutionary relationship, whereas a shorter LCS implies higher divergence. Equally, figuring out the LCS inside a household of proteins can spotlight conserved practical domains, shedding gentle on their shared organic roles.
Sensible functions of LCS calculation in bioinformatics lengthen to various areas. Genome alignment, a cornerstone of comparative genomics, depends closely on LCS algorithms to determine areas of similarity and distinction between genomes. This info is essential for understanding genome group, evolution, and figuring out potential disease-causing genes. A number of sequence alignment, which extends LCS to greater than two sequences, allows phylogenetic evaluation, the examine of evolutionary relationships amongst organisms. By figuring out frequent subsequences throughout a number of species, researchers can reconstruct evolutionary bushes and hint the historical past of life. Moreover, LCS algorithms contribute to gene prediction by figuring out conserved coding areas inside genomic DNA. This info is essential for annotating genomes and understanding the practical parts inside DNA sequences.
The flexibility to effectively and precisely decide the LCS of organic sequences has change into indispensable in bioinformatics. The insights derived from LCS calculations contribute considerably to our understanding of genetics, evolution, and illness. Challenges in adapting LCS algorithms to deal with the precise complexities of organic knowledge, similar to insertions, deletions, and mutations, proceed to drive analysis and growth on this space. Addressing these challenges results in extra strong and refined instruments for analyzing organic sequences and extracting significant info from the ever-increasing quantity of genomic knowledge.
8. Model Management Utility
Model management techniques rely closely on environment friendly distinction detection algorithms to handle file revisions and merge modifications. Longest frequent subsequence (LCS) calculation gives a strong basis for this performance. By figuring out the LCS between two variations of a file, model management techniques can pinpoint shared content material and isolate modifications. This permits for concise illustration of modifications, environment friendly storage of revisions, and automatic merging of modifications. For instance, think about two variations of a supply code file. An LCS algorithm can determine unchanged blocks of code, highlighting solely the traces added, deleted, or modified. This targeted strategy simplifies the assessment course of, reduces storage necessities, and allows automated merging of concurrent modifications, minimizing conflicts.
The sensible significance of LCS inside model management extends past fundamental distinction detection. LCS algorithms allow options like blame/annotate, which identifies the writer of every line in a file, facilitating accountability and aiding in debugging. They contribute to producing patches and diffs, compact representations of modifications between file variations, essential for collaborative growth and distributed model management. Furthermore, understanding the LCS between branches in a model management repository simplifies merging and resolving conflicts. The size of the LCS gives a quantifiable measure of department divergence, informing builders concerning the potential complexity of a merge operation. This info empowers builders to make knowledgeable choices about branching methods and merge processes, streamlining collaborative workflows.
Efficient LCS algorithms are important for the efficiency and scalability of model management techniques, particularly when coping with giant repositories and sophisticated file histories. Challenges embrace optimizing LCS calculation for varied file sorts (textual content, binary, and so on.) and dealing with giant recordsdata effectively. The continued growth of extra refined LCS algorithms immediately contributes to improved model management functionalities, facilitating extra streamlined collaboration and environment friendly administration of codebases throughout various software program growth initiatives. This connection highlights the essential function LCS calculations play within the underlying infrastructure of recent software program growth practices.
9. Info Retrieval Enhancement
Info retrieval techniques profit considerably from methods that improve the accuracy and effectivity of search outcomes. Longest frequent subsequence (LCS) calculation affords a useful strategy to refining search queries and bettering the relevance of retrieved info. By figuring out frequent subsequences between search queries and listed paperwork, LCS algorithms contribute to extra exact matching and retrieval of related content material, even when queries and paperwork comprise variations in phrasing or phrase order. This connection between LCS calculation and knowledge retrieval enhancement is essential for optimizing search engine efficiency and delivering extra satisfying consumer experiences.
-
Question Refinement
LCS algorithms can refine consumer queries by figuring out the core parts shared between totally different question formulations. As an illustration, if a consumer searches for “finest Italian eating places close to me” and one other searches for “top-rated Italian meals close by,” an LCS algorithm can extract the frequent subsequence “Italian eating places close to,” forming a extra concise and generalized question. This refined question can retrieve a broader vary of related outcomes, capturing the underlying intent regardless of variations in phrasing. This refinement results in extra complete search outcomes, encompassing a wider vary of related info.
-
Doc Rating
LCS calculations contribute to doc rating by assessing the similarity between a question and listed paperwork. Paperwork sharing longer LCSs with a question are thought of extra related and ranked larger in search outcomes. Take into account a seek for “efficient mission administration methods.” Paperwork containing phrases like “efficient mission administration methods” or “methods for profitable mission administration” would share an extended LCS with the question in comparison with paperwork merely mentioning “mission administration” in passing. This nuanced rating primarily based on subsequence size improves the precision of search outcomes, prioritizing paperwork carefully aligned with the consumer’s intent.
-
Plagiarism Detection
LCS algorithms play a key function in plagiarism detection by figuring out substantial similarities between texts. Evaluating a doc towards a corpus of present texts, the LCS size serves as a measure of potential plagiarism. An extended LCS suggests vital overlap, warranting additional investigation. This utility of LCS calculation is essential for educational integrity, copyright safety, and making certain the originality of content material. By effectively figuring out doubtlessly plagiarized passages, LCS algorithms contribute to sustaining moral requirements and mental property rights.
-
Fuzzy Matching
Fuzzy matching, which tolerates minor discrepancies between search queries and paperwork, advantages from LCS calculations. LCS algorithms can determine matches even when spelling errors, variations in phrase order, or slight phrasing variations exist. As an illustration, a seek for “accomodation” would possibly nonetheless retrieve paperwork containing “lodging” because of the lengthy shared subsequence. This flexibility enhances the robustness of data retrieval techniques, accommodating consumer errors and variations in language, bettering the recall of related info even with imperfect queries.
These aspects spotlight the numerous contribution of LCS calculation to enhancing info retrieval. By enabling question refinement, bettering doc rating, facilitating plagiarism detection, and supporting fuzzy matching, LCS algorithms empower info retrieval techniques to ship extra correct, complete, and user-friendly outcomes. Ongoing analysis in adapting LCS algorithms to deal with the complexities of pure language processing and large-scale datasets continues to drive additional developments in info retrieval expertise.
Continuously Requested Questions
This part addresses frequent inquiries concerning longest frequent subsequence (LCS) calculators and their underlying rules.
Query 1: How does an LCS calculator differ from a Levenshtein distance calculator?
Whereas each assess string similarity, an LCS calculator focuses on the longest shared subsequence, disregarding the order of parts. Levenshtein distance quantifies the minimal variety of edits (insertions, deletions, substitutions) wanted to remodel one string into one other.
Query 2: What algorithms are generally employed in LCS calculators?
Dynamic programming is essentially the most prevalent algorithm on account of its effectivity. Different algorithms, similar to Hirschberg’s algorithm, exist for particular situations with house constraints.
Query 3: How is LCS calculation utilized in bioinformatics?
LCS evaluation is essential for evaluating DNA and protein sequences, enabling insights into evolutionary relationships, figuring out conserved areas, and aiding in gene prediction.
Query 4: How does LCS contribute to model management techniques?
LCS algorithms underpin distinction detection in model management, enabling environment friendly storage of revisions, automated merging of modifications, and options like blame/annotate.
Query 5: What function does LCS play in info retrieval?
LCS enhances info retrieval by means of question refinement, doc rating, plagiarism detection, and fuzzy matching, bettering the accuracy and relevance of search outcomes.
Query 6: What are the restrictions of LCS calculation?
LCS algorithms might be computationally intensive for terribly lengthy sequences. The selection of algorithm and implementation considerably impacts efficiency and scalability. Moreover, decoding LCS outcomes requires contemplating the precise utility context and potential nuances of the information.
Understanding these frequent questions gives a deeper appreciation for the capabilities and functions of LCS calculators.
For additional exploration, the next sections delve into particular use instances and superior matters associated to LCS calculation.
Ideas for Efficient Use of LCS Algorithms
Optimizing the applying of longest frequent subsequence (LCS) algorithms requires cautious consideration of assorted elements. The following pointers present steerage for efficient utilization throughout various domains.
Tip 1: Choose the Applicable Algorithm: Dynamic programming is mostly environment friendly, however various algorithms like Hirschberg’s algorithm is perhaps extra appropriate for particular useful resource constraints. Algorithm choice ought to think about sequence size, out there reminiscence, and efficiency necessities.
Tip 2: Preprocess Information: Cleansing and preprocessing enter sequences can considerably enhance the effectivity and accuracy of LCS calculations. Eradicating irrelevant characters, dealing with case sensitivity, and standardizing formatting improve algorithm efficiency.
Tip 3: Take into account Sequence Traits: Understanding the character of the enter sequences, similar to alphabet dimension and anticipated size of the LCS, can inform algorithm choice and parameter tuning. Specialised algorithms could supply efficiency benefits for particular sequence traits.
Tip 4: Optimize for Particular Functions: Adapting LCS algorithms to the goal utility can yield vital advantages. For bioinformatics, incorporating scoring matrices for nucleotide or amino acid substitutions enhances the organic relevance of the outcomes. In model management, customizing the algorithm to deal with particular file sorts improves effectivity.
Tip 5: Consider Efficiency: Benchmarking totally different algorithms and implementations on consultant datasets is essential for choosing essentially the most environment friendly strategy. Metrics like execution time, reminiscence utilization, and LCS accuracy ought to information analysis.
Tip 6: Deal with Edge Instances: Take into account edge instances like empty sequences, sequences with repeating characters, or extraordinarily lengthy sequences. Implement applicable error dealing with and enter validation to make sure robustness and forestall sudden conduct.
Tip 7: Leverage Current Libraries: Make the most of established libraries and instruments for LCS calculation each time attainable. These libraries typically present optimized implementations and cut back growth time.
Using these methods enhances the effectiveness of LCS algorithms throughout varied domains. Cautious consideration of those elements ensures optimum efficiency, accuracy, and relevance of outcomes.
This exploration of sensible suggestions for LCS algorithm utility units the stage for concluding remarks and broader views on future developments on this subject.
Conclusion
This exploration has offered a complete overview of longest frequent subsequence (LCS) calculators, encompassing their underlying rules, algorithmic implementations, and various functions. From dynamic programming and various algorithms to the importance of string evaluation and subsequence identification, the technical aspects of LCS calculation have been totally examined. Moreover, the sensible utility of LCS calculators has been highlighted throughout varied domains, together with bioinformatics, model management, and knowledge retrieval. The function of LCS in analyzing organic sequences, managing file revisions, and enhancing search relevance underscores its broad impression on trendy computational duties. An understanding of the strengths and limitations of various LCS algorithms empowers efficient utilization and knowledgeable interpretation of outcomes.
The continued growth of extra refined algorithms and the growing availability of computational sources promise to additional develop the applicability of LCS calculation. As datasets develop in dimension and complexity, environment friendly and correct evaluation turns into more and more essential. Continued exploration of LCS algorithms and their functions holds vital potential for advancing analysis and innovation throughout various fields. The flexibility to determine and analyze frequent subsequences inside knowledge stays an important factor in extracting significant insights and furthering information discovery.
