A software designed to regulate pupil scores primarily based on the general class efficiency transforms uncooked scores into relative standings inside a bunch. As an illustration, if the typical rating on an examination is 70%, however the desired common is 80%, the software systematically will increase every pupil’s mark to attain the goal distribution. This course of usually entails scaling scores primarily based on commonplace deviations from the imply, making a extra normalized distribution of grades.
Normalizing evaluation outcomes permits for fairer comparisons throughout completely different sections of the identical course and even between completely different programs fully, notably when class sizes or problem ranges differ. This strategy can mitigate the impression of things exterior pupil management, resembling a very difficult examination, and supply a extra correct reflection of particular person efficiency relative to friends. Traditionally, the observe of adjusting scores emerged as a way to handle inconsistencies in grading practices and standardize educational analysis.
This text will additional discover the strategies, implications, and varied functions of rating adjustment methods in schooling. Subjects coated will embrace completely different curve varieties, the statistical rationale behind them, and potential benefits and downsides of their implementation.
1. Normalization
Normalization lies on the coronary heart of grading on a curve. It addresses the inherent variability in evaluation problem and pupil preparedness by adjusting scores to a predetermined distribution. This course of mitigates the impression of outlier occasions, resembling an unusually tough examination or uneven instruction throughout completely different class sections. With out normalization, a pupil in a extra demanding class may obtain a decrease grade than a peer with equal aptitude in a much less rigorous setting. For instance, if two sections of the identical course have common scores of 70% and 85% respectively, normalization may regulate scores within the first part upwards to mirror their efficiency relative to the general course expectations, guaranteeing equity and comparability. This course of doesn’t essentially change the rating inside a particular class, nevertheless it permits for significant comparisons throughout completely different teams.
The sensible significance of normalization turns into notably obvious when contemplating high-stakes assessments, resembling faculty entrance exams. These exams are administered throughout various populations and testing environments. Normalization ensures that scores mirror potential reasonably than exterior components like check type problem or regional variations in instructional requirements. By anchoring scores to a normal distribution, normalization gives a extra equitable foundation for comparability and choice. This enables establishments to make extra knowledgeable selections, assured that scores precisely symbolize pupil aptitude no matter testing circumstances.
In abstract, normalization is essential for reaching honest and constant grading practices. Its function in mitigating the impression of extraneous components on evaluation outcomes ensures that pupil efficiency is evaluated relative to a standardized framework, selling fairness and comparability throughout completely different instructional contexts. Whereas not with out its limitations and potential criticisms, normalization stays a significant software in trendy instructional evaluation, notably in eventualities requiring comparisons throughout disparate teams or assessments.
2. Adjustment
Adjustment varieties the core mechanism of a grading on a curve calculator. It transforms uncooked scores into normalized grades, reflecting relative efficiency inside a bunch. Understanding the nuances of this course of is essential for decoding the ensuing grades precisely.
-
Kinds of Changes
A number of distinct adjustment strategies exist, every impacting rating distribution otherwise. A regular bell curve adjustment goals to create a traditional distribution, usually centered round a predetermined common. Different strategies would possibly regulate scores primarily based on mounted percentages or by elevating the bottom scores to a minimal threshold. As an illustration, a bell curve would possibly rework a uncooked rating of 80% right into a curved grade of 85% if the category common is decrease than desired, whereas a percentage-based adjustment may add a set 5% to each pupil’s rating. Choosing the suitable technique is dependent upon the particular grading targets and the traits of the uncooked rating distribution.
-
Impression on Particular person Scores
The precise impression on a person’s grade is dependent upon their uncooked rating relative to the general class efficiency. College students scoring considerably above the typical usually expertise smaller changes than these nearer to or beneath the typical. A pupil with a uncooked rating of 95% would possibly see minimal change, whereas a pupil with 70% may expertise a extra important enhance. This dynamic can incentivize enchancment even for high-performing college students whereas offering a security internet for these dealing with challenges.
-
Transparency and Communication
Clear communication in regards to the adjustment course of is significant for sustaining equity and pupil belief. Clearly explaining the chosen technique, the rationale behind its use, and the particular calculations concerned helps college students perceive the that means of their adjusted grades. Lack of transparency can result in confusion and erode confidence within the grading system. Open communication fosters a extra constructive studying atmosphere.
-
Potential Drawbacks
Whereas designed to advertise equity, rating adjustment can generally create unintended penalties. As an illustration, it might foster an excessively aggressive classroom atmosphere if college students understand grading as a zero-sum recreation. Moreover, if not fastidiously carried out, sure adjustment strategies would possibly disproportionately profit college students at particular rating ranges, probably resulting in inequities. Cautious consideration of those potential drawbacks is essential for accountable implementation.
Understanding these aspects of adjustment gives a deeper understanding of how grading on a curve calculators operate and their potential impression on pupil studying and analysis. Recognizing the particular adjustment technique, its affect on particular person scores, the significance of transparency, and the potential pitfalls permits for knowledgeable interpretation of curved grades and facilitates the event of extra equitable and efficient grading practices.
3. Distribution
Distribution varieties the inspiration of grading on a curve. The idea revolves round adjusting particular person scores to suit a predetermined distribution sample, usually a traditional or bell curve. This distribution represents the specified unfold of grades throughout the coed inhabitants. The form of this distribution, influenced by components like commonplace deviation and desired common, immediately determines the diploma and nature of rating changes. For instance, a slender distribution clustered across the common will end in smaller changes than a broader, extra spread-out distribution. The connection between the uncooked rating distribution and the goal distribution dictates the particular calculations carried out by the calculator.
Contemplate a state of affairs the place a category performs exceptionally nicely on an examination, with many scores clustered close to the highest. Making use of a bell curve on this state of affairs may end in compression of the upper grades, probably diminishing recognition of outstanding efficiency. Conversely, if scores are extensively scattered with a low common, making use of a curve would possibly inflate grades considerably, probably masking true efficiency ranges. Subsequently, the selection of distribution and its parameters should align with the particular studying targets and evaluation targets. Understanding the distribution’s function is essential for decoding the adjusted grades meaningfully. A pupil’s curved grade displays their place not solely throughout the uncooked rating distribution but in addition throughout the chosen goal distribution.
Efficient use of a grading on a curve calculator requires a nuanced understanding of the interaction between uncooked scores, goal distributions, and the ensuing changes. Challenges can come up when the chosen distribution doesn’t precisely mirror the true distribution of pupil talents. Over-reliance on a single distribution mannequin can result in misinterpretations of pupil efficiency. Moreover, making use of a curve with out contemplating the context of the evaluation can lead to unfair or demotivating outcomes. Subsequently, cautious consideration of the distribution’s traits and its implications for particular person grades is crucial for accountable and efficient implementation of curve-based grading practices.
4. Normal Deviation
Normal deviation performs a vital function in grading on a curve, quantifying the unfold or dispersion of scores inside a category. It serves as a key parameter in figuring out the diploma of adjustment utilized to particular person scores. A bigger commonplace deviation signifies a wider unfold of scores, leading to extra important changes when making use of a curve. Conversely, a smaller commonplace deviation signifies a tighter clustering of scores across the imply, resulting in much less pronounced changes. This relationship between commonplace deviation and the magnitude of changes ensures that the curve displays the variability of pupil efficiency. As an illustration, in a category with a normal deviation of 15 factors, the distinction between a B and a C is likely to be bigger than in a category with a normal deviation of 5 factors after making use of a curve.
Understanding the impression of normal deviation is crucial for decoding curved grades precisely. A seemingly small distinction in uncooked scores can translate into a bigger grade distinction after making use of a curve, particularly in distributions with excessive commonplace deviations. This impact is amplified in grading techniques that use mounted grade ranges primarily based on commonplace deviations from the imply. Contemplate two college students: one scoring one commonplace deviation above the imply and one other scoring half a normal deviation above. In a curve designed to distribute grades usually, the primary pupil would possibly obtain an Some time the second receives a B, even when their uncooked scores are comparatively shut. This emphasizes the significance of contemplating commonplace deviation when evaluating efficiency inside a curved grading system.
In abstract, commonplace deviation gives a important measure of rating dispersion, informing the calculations carried out by a grading on a curve calculator. Its affect on the magnitude of rating changes underscores its significance in decoding curved grades. Recognizing the interaction between commonplace deviation, rating distribution, and particular person grade outcomes gives a deeper understanding of the impression of curve-based grading practices. Failure to account for normal deviation can result in misinterpretations of pupil efficiency and potential inequities in grading outcomes.
5. Relative Grading
Relative grading establishes a pupil’s efficiency standing primarily based on their place throughout the class distribution, reasonably than in opposition to absolute standards. This strategy inextricably hyperlinks relative grading to grading on a curve calculators, because the calculator gives the mechanism for remodeling uncooked scores into relative rankings. Analyzing the aspects of relative grading clarifies this connection and its implications for educational evaluation.
-
Competitors and Collaboration
Relative grading can foster each competitors and collaboration amongst college students. Whereas competitors arises from the inherent rating system, it might additionally encourage collaborative studying as college students attempt to enhance their understanding to boost their relative standing. For instance, research teams would possibly emerge as college students acknowledge the worth of shared studying in enhancing their efficiency throughout the class distribution. Nevertheless, an excessively aggressive atmosphere may discourage collaboration if college students prioritize particular person features over collective studying. The stability between these dynamics is dependent upon the particular classroom tradition and the implementation of relative grading.
-
Efficiency Contextualization
Relative grading gives context for particular person efficiency. A rating of 80% features extra that means when understood as the best rating within the class or as falling throughout the common vary. This contextualization can present extra nuanced suggestions than merely evaluating a rating to an arbitrary threshold. Contemplate a state of affairs the place a pupil scores 75% on a difficult examination. In a conventional grading system, this is likely to be a C. Nevertheless, if curved utilizing relative grading, this similar rating would possibly change into an A if it is the best rating in a very tough evaluation. This strategy can inspire college students who would possibly in any other case be discouraged by seemingly low scores.
-
Percentile Ranks and Grade Distributions
Relative grading usually makes use of percentile ranks to determine a pupil’s place throughout the class. A pupil scoring within the ninetieth percentile carried out higher than 90% of their friends. This metric is definitely calculable with a grading on a curve calculator and gives a transparent, readily comprehensible measure of relative standing. Moreover, visualizing grade distributions facilitates comparability between lessons or completely different iterations of the identical course. As an illustration, instructors can observe whether or not a specific evaluation resulted in a skewed distribution, probably indicating points with the examination itself or particular studying gaps throughout the pupil inhabitants.
-
Addressing Inherent Evaluation Variability
Relative grading acknowledges inherent variations in evaluation problem and pupil preparedness throughout completely different lessons or sections. It goals to stage the taking part in area by evaluating college students to their direct friends, reasonably than holding all college students to a uniform commonplace no matter context. This addresses potential inequities arising from variations in instruction, evaluation design, or pupil demographics. Utilizing a grading on a curve calculator, uncooked scores from completely different sections of the identical course might be normalized to a shared distribution, guaranteeing fairer comparisons between pupil cohorts.
These aspects spotlight how relative grading, facilitated by grading on a curve calculators, shifts the main focus from absolute scores to efficiency relative to friends. This strategy gives a extra nuanced and contextualized view of pupil achievement, recognizing that efficiency shouldn’t be solely decided by particular person effort but in addition influenced by the particular studying atmosphere and the general efficiency of the cohort. Whereas not with out limitations, relative grading gives a priceless software for enhancing equity and offering extra informative suggestions in educational evaluation.
6. Equity
Equity in educational analysis represents a fancy and sometimes debated ideally suited. Using a grading on a curve calculator immediately intersects with this ideally suited, elevating questions on equitable evaluation practices. Analyzing the aspects of equity throughout the context of curve-based grading illuminates each its potential advantages and inherent challenges.
-
Mitigation of Exterior Components
Curve-based grading can improve equity by mitigating the impression of exterior components past pupil management. A very tough examination, inconsistencies in educating high quality throughout completely different sections, or unexpected disruptions to the educational atmosphere can disproportionately have an effect on pupil efficiency. Adjusting grades primarily based on the general class efficiency helps stage the taking part in area, guaranteeing that college students are evaluated relative to their friends reasonably than in opposition to an arbitrary commonplace probably skewed by exterior components. As an illustration, if one part of a course has considerably decrease common efficiency as a result of an inexperienced teacher, a curve can regulate their grades upwards to mirror their studying relative to different sections, selling a extra equitable end result.
-
Comparability Throughout Cohorts
Honest comparisons throughout completely different cohorts symbolize one other facet of equity influenced by curve-based grading. Variations in pupil demographics, educational preparedness, and educational approaches throughout completely different lessons or semesters can render direct rating comparisons deceptive. Making use of a curve permits for normalized comparisons, guaranteeing that grades mirror relative standing inside every cohort reasonably than absolute efficiency. That is notably related in massive college settings the place completely different sections of the identical course is likely to be taught by completely different instructors with various educating types. The curve permits for fairer comparisons of pupil efficiency regardless of these variations.
-
Transparency and Consistency
Equity requires transparency and consistency in grading practices. When using a grading on a curve calculator, clearly speaking the chosen methodology, the rationale behind its use, and the particular calculations concerned is essential. This transparency permits college students to grasp how their grades are decided and ensures that the adjustment course of is utilized constantly throughout all college students. Lack of transparency can result in perceptions of bias and erode belief within the grading system. Clear communication in regards to the curve’s parameters and its impression on particular person grades fosters a extra equitable and clear analysis course of.
-
Potential for Bias and Distortion
Whereas aiming to boost equity, curve-based grading can even introduce potential biases and deform the illustration of pupil achievement. For instance, in extremely aggressive environments, a curve would possibly disproportionately profit top-performing college students whereas penalizing these within the center or decrease ranks. Moreover, sure curve varieties won’t precisely mirror the true distribution of pupil talents, resulting in synthetic inflation or deflation of grades. Cautious consideration of those potential biases is essential for accountable implementation. Choosing an applicable curve kind and guaranteeing its parameters align with the particular studying targets and evaluation targets mitigates the chance of unfair outcomes.
These aspects of equity spotlight the complicated relationship between grading on a curve calculators and equitable evaluation. Whereas curves provide the potential to mitigate exterior components, improve comparability, and promote transparency, additionally they current challenges associated to potential biases and distortions. Considerate implementation, together with cautious choice of curve varieties and clear communication, is crucial for harnessing the advantages of curve-based grading whereas minimizing the dangers to equity and fairness.
7. Rating Transformation
Rating transformation, the core operate of a grading on a curve calculator, alters uncooked scores primarily based on the general class efficiency. This course of shifts the main focus from absolute scores to relative standing throughout the group, impacting particular person grade outcomes and interpretations of pupil achievement. Understanding the aspects of rating transformation is crucial for comprehending the implications of curve-based grading.
-
Normalization Procedures
Normalization procedures type the idea of rating transformation. These procedures purpose to regulate scores to a predetermined distribution, usually a traditional or bell curve. Totally different normalization strategies exist, every with various impacts on rating changes. For instance, a linear transformation would possibly shift all scores upwards by a set quantity, whereas a non-linear transformation may compress or broaden sure rating ranges. The selection of normalization process is dependent upon the particular grading targets and the traits of the uncooked rating distribution. Selecting an applicable technique is essential for guaranteeing that the transformation precisely displays relative efficiency.
-
Impression on Grade Distribution
Rating transformation immediately impacts the ultimate grade distribution. A curve can rework a skewed uncooked rating distribution, the place scores cluster at one finish, right into a extra balanced distribution, resembling a traditional distribution. This transformation impacts the variety of college students receiving every letter grade. As an illustration, a category with many excessive uncooked scores would possibly see fewer A’s after making use of a curve that compresses the higher rating vary. Understanding the impression on grade distribution permits for knowledgeable interpretation of grade outcomes and ensures alignment with the specified distribution of grades.
-
Percentiles and Relative Standing
Transformation clarifies pupil standing relative to friends. Calculating percentile ranks after making use of a curve gives a readily comprehensible measure of relative efficiency. A pupil within the seventy fifth percentile after transformation carried out higher than 75% of their classmates, no matter their uncooked rating. This data enhances suggestions and gives a extra nuanced understanding of accomplishment throughout the group context. This concentrate on relative efficiency contrasts with conventional grading the place percentiles play a much less distinguished function.
-
Transparency and Interpretability
Transparency within the transformation course of is paramount. Clearly speaking the chosen normalization process, the rationale for its use, and the particular calculations concerned enhances the interpretability of the remodeled scores. This transparency ensures that college students perceive how their remaining grades are derived, fostering belief and facilitating significant suggestions. With out transparency, the remodeled scores lack context and may result in misinterpretations of pupil efficiency. Open communication in regards to the transformation course of promotes equity and understanding.
These aspects of rating transformation spotlight its central function in grading on a curve. By shifting the main focus from absolute scores to relative standing, transformation gives a distinct perspective on pupil achievement. Understanding the normalization procedures, the impression on grade distribution, the usage of percentiles, and the significance of transparency are essential for successfully decoding and using curved grades. Efficient implementation of curve-based grading requires cautious consideration of those aspects to make sure honest and significant analysis of pupil studying.
8. Efficiency Comparability
Efficiency comparability varieties a central goal of grading on a curve. The calculator facilitates this comparability by remodeling uncooked scores into relative rankings inside a category. This shift from absolute to relative efficiency permits for a extra nuanced analysis, contemplating the context of the general class efficiency. As an alternative of merely evaluating a pupil’s rating in opposition to a set commonplace, curve-based grading permits for comparisons in opposition to peer efficiency. This strategy acknowledges {that a} rating of 75%, for instance, holds completely different meanings relying on whether or not it represents the best rating in a difficult examination or a below-average efficiency in a neater evaluation. A grading on a curve calculator gives the mechanism for making these relative comparisons, producing metrics like percentile ranks that place particular person efficiency throughout the bigger class context. For instance, a pupil within the eightieth percentile outperformed 80% of their classmates, offering a extra informative evaluation than the uncooked rating alone.
The sensible significance of this efficiency comparability facilitated by curve-based grading extends past particular person pupil analysis. It permits instructors to realize insights into the general effectiveness of their educating and establish areas the place college students is likely to be struggling. A tightly clustered distribution of curved scores suggests constant understanding, whereas a extensively dispersed distribution would possibly point out uneven comprehension or potential points with the evaluation itself. Moreover, evaluating curved grade distributions throughout completely different sections of the identical course can reveal discrepancies in instruction or pupil preparedness. As an illustration, if one part constantly performs decrease than others even after curving, it’d sign a necessity for pedagogical changes or extra assist for that particular cohort. These comparative insights, enabled by the calculator, can inform educational methods and enhance studying outcomes.
In conclusion, the connection between efficiency comparability and grading on a curve calculators is prime to the utility of this grading strategy. The calculator transforms particular person scores into relative rankings, enabling significant comparisons inside a category context. This shift fosters a extra nuanced understanding of pupil achievement, contemplating the affect of general class efficiency on particular person outcomes. Furthermore, the comparative insights derived from curve-based grading inform educational practices and promote extra equitable analysis by acknowledging variations in studying environments and evaluation problem. Nevertheless, the restrictions and potential biases of curve-based grading have to be fastidiously thought of to make sure its accountable and efficient utility.
Incessantly Requested Questions
Addressing frequent queries relating to grading on a curve calculators clarifies their operate and implications for educational analysis.
Query 1: Does grading on a curve assure a sure proportion of scholars will obtain every letter grade?
Not essentially. Whereas some curving strategies purpose for a particular distribution, the ultimate grade distribution is dependent upon the chosen curve kind and the traits of the uncooked rating distribution. A bell curve, for instance, goals for a standard distribution however does not assure a predetermined proportion for every grade.
Query 2: Can curving decrease a pupil’s grade?
Sure. Whereas usually used to boost grades, curves regulate scores relative to class efficiency. If a pupil performs considerably above common in a category with typically low efficiency, their grade would possibly lower after curving to suit the goal distribution. Nevertheless, this state of affairs is dependent upon the particular curve utilized.
Query 3: Is grading on a curve inherently fairer than conventional grading?
Equity is dependent upon context and implementation. Curves can mitigate exterior components affecting efficiency, however they will additionally introduce bias. Cautious choice of the curve kind and clear communication are essential for equitable outcomes. No single grading technique ensures absolute equity.
Query 4: How do completely different curve varieties impression rating changes?
Numerous curve varieties exist, every using completely different adjustment mechanisms. A regular bell curve adjusts scores in direction of a traditional distribution, whereas different strategies would possibly add mounted percentages or increase the bottom scores. The chosen technique determines the particular impression on particular person grades. Researching varied curve varieties is essential for understanding their results.
Query 5: What function does commonplace deviation play in grading on a curve?
Normal deviation quantifies rating dispersion. A bigger commonplace deviation signifies wider rating unfold, leading to extra substantial changes when making use of a curve. Understanding commonplace deviation clarifies the magnitude of changes and the ensuing impression on grades.
Query 6: How does curve-based grading have an effect on pupil motivation and competitors?
Curve-based grading can introduce each constructive and detrimental impacts on pupil motivation. Whereas the relative nature of grading would possibly encourage some college students to outperform their friends, it may additionally foster extreme competitors or discourage collaboration. The precise impression is dependent upon the classroom atmosphere and the implementation of curve-based grading. Balancing competitors and collaboration requires cautious pedagogical consideration.
Cautious consideration of those questions enhances understanding of grading on a curve calculators and informs their accountable implementation.
This text will subsequent delve into sensible examples and case research illustrating the appliance and impression of curve-based grading in varied instructional settings.
Sensible Ideas for Using Curve-Based mostly Grading
Efficient implementation of curve-based grading requires cautious consideration of assorted components. The next ideas provide sensible steering for educators contemplating this grading strategy.
Tip 1: Transparency is Paramount
Brazenly talk the chosen curving technique, its rationale, and its impression on grades to college students. Transparency fosters belief and understanding, mitigating potential anxieties surrounding curved grading.
Tip 2: Choose the Applicable Curve Sort
Totally different curve varieties obtain completely different grading targets. A bell curve goals for a standard distribution, whereas different strategies goal particular grade ranges or regulate scores by mounted percentages. Align the curve kind with the particular studying targets and the traits of the evaluation.
Tip 3: Contemplate the Context of the Evaluation
An unusually tough examination would possibly warrant a extra beneficiant curve than a routine quiz. Contextual components like evaluation problem, pupil preparedness, and exterior disruptions to studying ought to inform curving selections.
Tip 4: Keep away from Over-Reliance on Curving
Curving ought to complement, not exchange, sound evaluation design and educational practices. Addressing elementary points with instruction or evaluation design is simpler than constantly counting on curves to appropriate skewed grade distributions.
Tip 5: Monitor the Impression on Scholar Motivation
Whereas curves can incentivize enchancment, extreme competitors can negatively impression collaboration and intrinsic motivation. Observe pupil dynamics and regulate the grading strategy as wanted to foster a constructive studying atmosphere.
Tip 6: Discover Alternate options to Conventional Curves
Contemplate different grading approaches like criterion-referenced grading or mastery-based studying, which concentrate on absolute efficiency in opposition to outlined requirements reasonably than relative efficiency inside a bunch. These strategies can complement or exchange curve-based grading relying on the particular studying targets.
Tip 7: Repeatedly Consider the Effectiveness of Curve-Based mostly Grading
Periodically assess the impression of curve-based grading on pupil studying, motivation, and general achievement. Collect suggestions from college students and mirror on the effectiveness of the chosen strategy. Be ready to regulate the grading technique primarily based on these evaluations.
Implementing the following tips helps guarantee accountable and efficient use of curve-based grading, maximizing its advantages whereas mitigating potential drawbacks. By specializing in transparency, context, and a balanced strategy to grading, educators can leverage curve-based strategies to boost equity and supply extra informative suggestions to college students.
This text will now conclude with a abstract of key takeaways and a dialogue of the broader implications of grading on a curve in trendy schooling.
Conclusion
Exploration of the grading on a curve calculator reveals its operate as a software for remodeling uncooked scores into relative rankings inside a category. Key points embrace normalization to a desired distribution, usually a bell curve, utilizing commonplace deviation to quantify rating dispersion and affect the magnitude of changes. Relative grading, facilitated by the calculator, contextualizes particular person efficiency throughout the group, providing insights past absolute scores. Whereas curve-based grading gives potential advantages like mitigating exterior components and enabling comparisons throughout cohorts, cautious consideration of equity, transparency, and potential biases is crucial. Rating transformation, the core operate of the calculator, requires considerate choice of normalization procedures and clear communication to make sure significant interpretation of outcomes.
Efficient implementation of curve-based grading necessitates a nuanced understanding of its implications. Educators should critically consider the appropriateness of assorted curve varieties, contemplating the particular studying context and potential impression on pupil motivation. Clear communication in regards to the chosen methodology and its rationale is essential for fostering belief and understanding. Ongoing analysis and a willingness to adapt grading methods primarily based on noticed outcomes stay important for accountable and equitable evaluation practices. Additional analysis exploring the long-term impacts of curve-based grading on pupil studying and achievement is warranted.
